academic writing

Assistive Yet Authorial: Critical Use of GenAI in Personal Narrative Prewriting

Activities, critical thought and analysis, digital literacy, drafting and revising, genAI, identity, narrative and storytelling, prewriting and invention, primary source research, Process, research, writing technologies /

Daehyun Won Assignments & Activities Archive Activity Description Due to the accelerating adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) across higher education, writing instructors face everyday challenges in developing academic writing skills while integrating GenAI to enhance digital literacy, critical AI literacy, and prompt engineering. Not to undermine students’ authorial agency, authentic voice, and ownership in […]

Assistive Yet Authorial: Critical Use of GenAI in Personal Narrative Prewriting Read More »

Owning the Process: Co-Learning AI Through Critical Inquiry and Workflow Literacy

Activities, collaboration and group work, critical thought and analysis, digital literacy, genAI, information literacy, Process, professional writing, writing technologies /

Jennifer N. Mason Assignments & Activities Archive Activity Description This in-class activity invites students and instructors to co-investigate how generative AI and other writing technologies shape composing processes across academic and professional contexts. The activity is grounded in workflow literacy—defined here as the reflective practice of analyzing how tasks, tools, technologies, and collaborators interact across

Owning the Process: Co-Learning AI Through Critical Inquiry and Workflow Literacy Read More »

Can ChatGPT Make the Right Moves? A Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Human-Authored and AI-Generated Texts

Assignments, critical thought and analysis, digital literacy, genAI, Process, rhetorical situation, writing technologies /

Michelle Cook, Gaby Meindl, and Angela Laflen Assignments & Activities Archive Assignment Description Helping students develop rhetorical knowledge acts as a bridge between understanding GenAI tools on a functional level and being a critical reader of texts generated by AI. Because we are preparing students to enter academic and professional spaces that have been, and

Can ChatGPT Make the Right Moves? A Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Human-Authored and AI-Generated Texts Read More »

Dramatizing the Conversation: Creating Dialogue Scripts to Support Source Synthesis

Activities, drafting and revising, Process, reading, reading strategies, reading to write, research, secondary source research, Synthesis /

Kim Fahle Peck Assignments & Activities Archive Activity Description Kenneth Burke’s famous parlor metaphor presents a picture of academic research as a conversation between ideas and perspectives: Imagine that you enter a parlor. You come late. When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too

Dramatizing the Conversation: Creating Dialogue Scripts to Support Source Synthesis Read More »

Changing Your Mindset About Revision

demystifying writing assignments, drafting and revising, Feedback, Process, Volume 5, writing myths and anxiety /

L. Lennie Irvin Volume 5 Chapter Description Many freshmen enter college with a one-draft writing process where revision means tidying up errors and then submitting the final product. This chapter is about changing your thinking about revision as a foundation for changing your practice of revision. The chapter explores the false concepts about writing and

Changing Your Mindset About Revision Read More »

The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly of Peer Review

drafting and revising, Feedback, peer review, Process, Volume 5 /

Erin E. Kelly Volume 5 Chapter Description Academic writing classes regularly require students to engage in peer review: that is, to read and comment on classmates’ work in progress in an attempt to make that work better. This chapter shows how such class activities connect to the practices of academic peer review associated with academic

The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly of Peer Review Read More »